Richest
1% now owns half the world’s wealth
The wealthiest 1 percent of the world’s population now owns
more than half of the world’s wealth, according to a new report.
The total wealth in the world grew by 6 percent over the
past 12 months to $280 trillion, marking the fastest wealth creation since
2012, according to the Credit Suisse report. More than half of the $16.7
trillion in new wealth was in the U.S., which grew $8.5 trillion richer.
But that wealth around the world is increasingly concentrated
among those at the top.
Are 26
billionaires worth more than half the planet? The debate, explained.
Here’s a wild statistic: The 26 richest people on earth in
2018 had the same net worth as the poorest half of the world’s population, some
3.8 billion people.
World's
Richest 1 Percent Own Twice as Much as Bottom 90 Percent
The more than twenty-one hundred billionaires globally own
more of the world's wealth than the 4.6 billion people at the bottom of the
global wealth pyramid, a report from Oxfam International finds.
According to the report, Time to Care: Unpaid and Underpaid
Care Work and the Global Inequality Crisis (64 pages, PDF), the number of
billionaires globally has doubled over the last decade, while the richest 1
percent have accumulated twice as much wealth as 90 percent of the global
population, some 6.9 billion people. And global wealth inequality is worsening,
in part because billionaire portfolios have enjoyed an average annual return of
7.4 percent over the last ten years — helped by low taxes and a 31 percent
increase in dividends to shareholders — even as the average wage in G7
countries rose only 3 percent. Evidence of "a flawed and sexist economic
system" is everywhere, the report's authors write.
The world’s 2,153 billionaires have more wealth than the 4.6
billion people who make up 60 percent of the planet’s population, reveals a new
report from Oxfam today ahead of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos,
Switzerland.
Global inequality is shockingly entrenched and vast and the
number of billionaires has doubled in the last decade. Oxfam India CEO Amitabh
Behar, who is in Davos to represent the Oxfam confederation this year said:
“The gap between rich and poor can't be resolved without deliberate
inequality-busting policies, and too few governments are committed to these.”
“Our broken economies are lining the pockets of billionaires
and big business at the expense of ordinary men and women. No wonder people are
starting to question whether billionaires should even exist,” Behar said.
Fight inequality, beat poverty
Eight men own the same wealth as the 3.6 billion people who
make up the poorest half of humanity, according to a new report published by
Oxfam today to mark the annual meeting of political and business leaders in
Davos.
Oxfam’s report, ‘An economy for the 99 percent’, shows that
the gap between rich and poor is far greater than had been feared. It details
how big business and the super-rich are fuelling the inequality crisis by
dodging taxes, driving down wages and using their power to influence politics.
It calls for a fundamental change in the way we manage our economies so that
they work for all people, and not just a fortunate few.
New and better data on the distribution of global wealth –
particularly in India and China – indicates that the poorest half of the world
has less wealth than had been previously thought. Had this new data been available last year,
it would have shown that nine billionaires owned the same wealth as the poorest
half of the planet, and not 62, as Oxfam calculated at the time
25
richest Americans paid little to nothing in federal income taxes: Report
The 25 richest Americans, including Jeff Bezos, Michael
Bloomberg and Elon Musk, paid relatively little — and sometimes nothing — in
federal income taxes between 2014 and 2018, according to an analysis from the
news organization ProPublica that was based on a trove of Internal Revenue
Service tax data.
The analysis showed that the nation’s richest executives
paid just a fraction of their wealth in taxes — $13.6 billion in federal income
taxes during a time period when their collective net worth increased by $401
billion, according to a tabulation by Forbes.
The documents reveal the stark inequity in the American tax
system, as plutocrats like Mr. Bezos, Mr. Bloomberg, Warren Buffett, Mr. Musk
and George Soros were able to benefit from a complex web of loopholes in the
tax code and the fact that the United States puts its emphasis on taxing labor
income versus wealth.
Top US
Companies Pay No Income Tax
At least 55 of the largest corporations in America paid no
federal corporate income taxes in their most recent fiscal year despite
enjoying substantial pretax profits in the United States. This continues a
decades-long trend of corporate tax avoidance by the biggest U.S. corporations,
and it appears to be the product of long-standing tax breaks preserved or
expanded by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) as well as the CARES Act tax
breaks enacted in the spring of 2020.
The tax-avoiding companies represent various industries and
collectively enjoyed almost $40.5 billion in U.S. pretax income in 2020,
according to their annual financial reports. The statutory federal tax rate for
corporate profits is 21 percent. The 55 corporations would have paid a collective
total of $8.5 billion for the year had they paid that rate on their 2020
income. Instead, they received $3.5 billion in tax rebates.
Their total corporate tax breaks for 2020, including $8.5
billion in tax avoidance and $3.5 billion in rebates, comes to $12 billion.
This report is based on ITEP’s analysis of annual financial
reports filed by the nation’s largest publicly traded U.S.-based corporations
in their most recent fiscal year. All data presented here come directly from
the income tax notes of these reports. Some companies with unusual fiscal years
have not yet filed such reports. Some publicly traded corporations paid nothing
on profits in their most recent fiscal year but are not included in this report
because they are not part of the S&P 500 or Fortune 500.
No-Tax Corporations Continue a Decades-Long Trend
For decades, the biggest and most profitable U.S.
corporations have found ways to shelter their profits from federal income
taxation. ITEP reports have documented such tax avoidance since the early years
of the Reagan administration’s misguided tax-cutting experiment. A widely cited
ITEP analysis of an eight-year period (2008 through 2015) confirmed that
federal tax avoidance remained rampant before the TCJA.
Now, with most corporations reporting their third year of
results under the new corporate tax laws pushed through by President Donald
Trump in 2017, it is crystal clear that the TCJA failed to address loopholes
that enable tax dodging—and may have made it worse.
The companies avoiding income taxes in 2020 represent very
different sectors of the U.S. economy:
Food conglomerate Archer Daniels Midland enjoyed $438
million of U.S. pretax income last year and received a federal tax rebate of
$164 million.
The delivery giant FedEx zeroed out its federal income tax
on $1.2 billion of U.S. pretax income in 2020 and received a rebate of $230
million.
The shoe manufacturer Nike didn’t pay a dime of federal
income tax on almost $2.9 billion of U.S. pretax income last year, instead
enjoying a $109 million tax rebate.
The cable TV provider DISH Network paid no federal income
taxes on $2.5 billion of U.S. income in 2020.
The software company Salesforce avoided all federal income
taxes on $2.6 billion of U.S. income.
The U.S. income, current federal income tax and effective
tax rates in 2020 for all 55 of the zero-tax companies are shown in the
following table.
Analysts determined that the 55 companies, all part of the
S&P 500 or Fortune 500, would have paid a combined total of $8.5 billion
last year if they had paid at a 21% rate (the statutory federal corporate tax
rate) on their profits.
Not only did they avoid paying any taxes on their profits,
but these companies also received $3.5 billion in tax rebates, according to
ITEP, a left-leaning, non-profit research group that analyzed each firm’s
annual financial reports.
No comments:
Post a Comment